According to a new estimate, there are about one trillion species of microbes on Earth, and 99.999 percent of them have yet to be discovered.
As recently as 1998, the number of microbial species was thought to be a few million at most — little more than the number of insect species. But estimates have been growing ever since. Now Kenneth J. Locey and Jay T. Lennon, biologists at Indiana University, have used two techniques to conclude that the number of microbial species is larger than any previous researchers have imagined.
The first method extrapolates from the available data for microbes, based not on individual organisms but on samples of DNA.
“So if we say a million, we mean a million pieces of DNA that we think belong to different organisms and among them represent different species,” Dr. Locey said.
Sign Up for the Science Times Newsletter
Every week, we’ll bring you stories that capture the wonders of the human body, nature and the cosmos.
The second approach was to use a well-known model of biodiversity as a basis for making predictions. “If you know the number of individuals, you can predict the most abundant species,” Dr. Locey said.
”So we used those two inputs — the number of individuals over all and the number of individuals belonging to the most abundant species — to estimate the total number of species.”
The two methods provided numbers that matched: Earth contains 10^11 to 10^12 species of microbes.
“We think our approach was rigorous in that we used a theoretical prediction and a statistical estimate,” he said. “We ended up with intersecting predictions based on different methods.”
Finding the number of species has broader implications, Dr. Locey said. “How many species could have actually evolved in four billion years? What are the upper constraints of evolution on Earth? How many species have evolved, how many could have evolved?
“As far as I know, no one has approached those questions. We’re very far away from discovering what’s really out there.”
Source: Earth May Be Home to a Trillion Microbes – The New York Times
Leave A Reply